There are several different types of construction contracts that contractors encounter. Those different contract types offer varying levels of risk and opportunity from the contractor’s perspective.
Contractors must balance the potential for profit with the possibility of financial loss or disputes. What follows is a brief analysis of the risks and benefits associated with each of the major construction contract types.
Fixed-Price Contracts (aka 'Stipulated Sum' or 'Lump-Sum' Contracts)
In a fixed-price contract, the contractor agrees to complete the entire project/scope for a specified sum, regardless of actual costs incurred. A fixed price contract is most commonly used for projects where there is a comprehensive design, documented in a complete set of construction documents in which the scope can be quantified accurately.
Benefits:
- Profit potential: If the contractor can manage the project efficiently and under budget, they can retain the difference between actual costs and the lump-sum price, leading to a higher profit margin.
- Simplified payment structure: Fixed-price contracts have a straightforward payment process, typically billed based on a ‘percent of completion’ or milestone basis with no back up required, reducing the complexity of invoicing and billing.
- Scope and expectations: With a well-defined scope and an accurate cost estimate, contractors can plan effectively to minimize cost over-runs & self-imposed delays, increasing the likelihood of a successful project.
Risks:
- Cost overrun responsibility: Contractors bear the risk of cost increases, such as material price spikes and labor costs. If costs exceed the lump sum, the contractor absorbs the losses.
- Scope and expectations: If the bid documents or initial cost estimates are inaccurate, contractors could underbid the project and end up operating at a loss.
- Scope Creep: If the design or project plans are incomplete, ambiguous, or flawed, the contractor may face challenges in execution, leading to delays or increased costs.
- Change Management: Changes in the project scope that are not clearly identified or addressed in change orders can increase project costs. Under a lump sum contract, the contractor is typically responsible for delivering the project within the agreed scope, even if the scope is poorly defined or misunderstood. Failure to properly manage scope changes can lead to additional work without additional compensation.
- Low initial bidding: Contractors may face competitive pressure to bid low to win the project, which can lead to thin margins. When competing for a project against multiple bidders the contractor must carefully balance their recognition of the scope of work, their desired ROI, and their ability to win the work.
Cost-Plus Contracts
Under a cost-plus contract, contractors are reimbursed for all costs related to the project, plus an additional fee (either a fixed amount or a percentage of costs). Cost Plus contracts are commonly seen in Residential Construction contracts and some commercial projects.
Benefits:
- Reduced financial risk: Contractors are protected from cost overruns since they are reimbursed for all direct expenses. This is especially advantageous when project scope or conditions are uncertain.
- Increased transparency: The detailed breakdown of costs can foster trust with the owner, potentially leading to repeat business and a more collaborative relationship.
- Flexibility: Contractors can adjust to changes in scope or unforeseen conditions without the risk of absorbing additional costs, provided they document these changes properly.
Risks:
- Increased administrative burden: The contractor must keep meticulous records of all costs, which increases administrative work. There is a misconception that a contractor cannot lose money in a Cost-Plus contract. Costs incurred and not billed are a drag on profitability.
- Increased transparency: The detailed breakdown of costs, and often a requirement for manifest billing, can lead to disputes over what qualifies as reimbursable expenses.
- Profit limitations: With cost-plus contracts, profit is often a percentage of the total cost, which may limit the contractor’s upside if they manage to complete the project under budget.
- No built-in incentives for efficiency: Since contractors are reimbursed for their costs, there is little direct incentive to complete the project quickly or minimize expenses. This could lead to concerns over inefficiency, which may strain relationships with the owner.
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Contracts
A GMP contract is a variation of the cost-plus model, where contractors are reimbursed up to a capped maximum amount. GMP contracts are commonly used on projects where the design is not fully developed and the Contractor is asked to “fill the gaps". A common misconception about GMP contracts is that the Guaranteed Maximum Price includes changes, thereby increasing the contractor risk. This is not a universal answer, but it can be generally stated that GMPs EXCLUDE Owner-directed increases in scope as well as most unforeseeable conditions.
Benefits:
- Risk-sharing: Contractors still benefit from reimbursement of costs, but there is a built-in cap that limits the owner’s financial exposure (excluding changes in scope), which can make this contract attractive to clients.
- Improved client relationships: Offering a GMP contract shows goodwill and flexibility, which can strengthen trust with the owner and lead to future work.
- Risk mitigation: GMP contracts often contain contingencies to bridge gaps identified between the state of the documents at the time the GMP is established and the owner or architect’s stated expectations. Additionally, Allowances can be established for incomplete design, further reducing the contractor’s risk.
- Incentive Clauses: If the contractor can complete the project under the GMP, they may be able to increase their profit margin through saving splits and other efficiency-based incentive clauses.
Risks:
- Cap on reimbursement: If costs exceed the GMP, the contractor bears the excess. This risk can be particularly problematic if unforeseen issues arise, such as delays, price increases, or design changes that the owner does not approve.
- Increased risk in estimating: Contractors must be careful when calculating the GMP, as underestimating the project could lead to a situation where they are completing work at a loss.
- Disputes over cost allocation: There can be disagreements with the Owner about which costs are covered under the GMP and which are not, particularly if the project involves numerous change orders or unclear scopes of work.
- Increased administrative burden: The contractor must keep meticulous records of all costs, which increases administrative work. Cost Plus contracts often include a requirement to produce detailed back-up for all monthly billings.
Time and Materials (T&M) Contracts
Similar to a Cost-Plus contract, in a T&M contract the contractor is paid for the time spent on the project and the materials used, along with a markup for overhead and profit. The difference is commonly manifested in guarantee of the schedule. T&M contracts are commonly used when the scope is difficult to define, such as renovation projects where existing conditions are difficult to determine, and a timeline is therefore difficult to define.
Benefits:
- Minimal financial risk: Contractor’s face little to no risk of cost overruns, as they are compensated for all hours worked and materials used. This is ideal for projects with uncertain scopes or fluctuating conditions.
- Profitability through markup: Contractors can charge a markup on materials and labor, which ensures a consistent profit margin.
- Flexibility: Contractors can adjust to changes in the project’s scope without worrying about absorbing the cost. This flexibility is advantageous for projects that are ill-defined at the outset.
Risks:
- Increased administrative burden: The contractor must keep meticulous records of all costs (Labor & Material), which increases administrative work. There is a common misconception that a contractor cannot lose money in a Time & Material contract. Again, costs incurred but not billed reduce profitability.
- Potential inefficiency perceptions: Since T&M contracts lack built-in incentives for speed or efficiency, the contractor may be perceived as drawing out the project to increase billable hours. This can strain relationships with the Owner or lead to reputational damage.
- Cap on profit: While the contractor is guaranteed to cover costs, profit margins are usually predetermined by the agreed-upon markup. This limits the opportunity for large profits, even if the contractor performs the work efficiently.
Unit Price Contracts
In unit price contracts, the contractor is paid a fixed rate for each unit of work (e.g., cubic yards of dirt or square feet of floor tile). The overall contract value depends on the actual quantity of work performed.
Benefits:
- Revenue tied to actual work: Contractors are paid based on the quantity of work performed, which can be beneficial for projects where there is uncertainty about the total scope but clarity about the work units.
- Adjusts for scope changes: As work quantities increase, contractors can generate additional revenue without renegotiating the contract terms, leading to potentially higher profits.
- Simplified pricing: With clear unit prices, contractors can easily estimate costs and track work, making it simpler to invoice clients.
Risks:
- Administrative burden: A contractor must keep meticulous records of the quantities installed to be properly reimbursed. Disagreements about how units of work are measured or verified can lead to payment disputes.
- Quantity underestimation: Unit prices established at the time of bid are based on either stated or assumed quantities and materials pricing. If the quantity of work needed, materials pricing, or the project scope changes significantly, the unit prices may not cover the contractors cost appropriately. The contract value could fall short of what is needed to cover fixed overhead and profit targets.
- Low initial bidding: Contractors may face competitive pressure to bid low on unit prices to win the project, which can lead to thin margins unless quantities increase dramatically.
Conclusion
From the contractor’s perspective, each construction contract type offers distinct risks and opportunities. Many times the contractor does not get to choose the form of contract. The key is for contractors to understand and assess their ability to manage cost, scope, and project complexity while considering their profit goals.
Fixed-price contracts provide the potential for higher profits but carry significant risk if costs are underestimated. Cost-plus and T&M contracts offer more cost protection but require more administration and limit upside gain from efficiency. GMP contracts offer a balance between cost control and profit potential but require careful management to avoid disputes or losses.
The graph above illustrates the relative risk versus benefit for contractors across different construction contract types.
Here’s a summary of what it represents:
Time & Materials (T&M) - contracts present low risk since contractors are paid for all costs incurred, but the benefit is also moderate.
Cost-Plus - contracts offer low risk for contractors since costs are reimbursed, but they provide moderate benefits due to limited profit incentives.
Unit Price - contracts offer medium risk and benefit, depending on accurate estimation and quantities of work performed.
GMP (Guaranteed Maximum Price) - contracts balance risk and benefit; they offer protection from runaway costs but cap profit potential.
Fixed-Price - contracts have high potential benefits but also carry the highest risk due to potential cost overruns.
In conclusion, understanding the nuances of each construction contract type is essential for contractors to balance risk and reward effectively. Fixed-price contracts offer the potential for higher profits but require accurate cost estimation and careful project management to avoid losses. Cost-plus and T&M contracts reduce financial risk by reimbursing costs but limit opportunities for increased profits and demand more administrative effort. GMP contracts strike a middle ground, offering cost control and profit potential while requiring close attention to changes and contingencies. Unit price contracts offer flexibility but rely on accurate scope estimation to maintain profitability.
Ultimately, no contract type is without its challenges. Contractors must assess their ability to manage project complexities, costs, and scope while aligning with their profit goals. By understanding these contract structures, contractors can make informed decisions, mitigate risk, and set themselves up for successful project outcomes and long-term business growth.
If you're ready to start working on your business, let's talk!
Ascent Consulting’s mission is to Build Better Construction Companies.
We are committed to delivering impressive results in the areas of
profitability, performance, and growth.